Actor and filmmaker Mel Gibson. / Credit: Georges Biard, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

CNA Staff, May 16, 2025 / 15:41 pm (CNA).

Production and distribution company Lionsgate has been chosen as the studio partnering with director Mel Gibson and Bruce Davey’s Icon Productions on the upcoming film “The Resurrection of the Christ,” the much-anticipated follow-up to “The Passion of the Christ.”

The news came in an announcement from Adam Fogelson, chair of Lionsgate Motion Picture Group, on May 15.

“For many, many people across the globe, ‘The Resurrection of the Christ’ is the most anticipated theatrical event in a generation. It is also an awe-inspiring and spectacularly epic theatrical film that is going to leave moviegoers worldwide breathless,” Fogelson said in a press release.  

“Mel is one of the greatest directors of our time, and this project is both deeply personal to him and the perfect showcase for his talents as a filmmaker. My relationship with Mel and Bruce dates back 30 years, and I am thrilled to be partnering with them once again on this landmark event for audiences,” he added. 

“Lionsgate’s brave, innovative spirit and nimble, can-do attitude have inspired me for a long time, and I couldn’t think of a more perfect distributor for ‘The Resurrection of the Christ,’” Gibson said.

“I’ve enjoyed working with Adam and the team several times over recent years. I know the clever ingenuity, passion, and ambition the entire team commits to their projects and I’m confident they will bring everything they can to the release of this movie.”

The first title teaser for the film was also released on social media platforms with the caption “THE RESURRECTION OF THE CHRIST — coming soon.”

In March it was reported that filming would begin this August in Italy, according to Manuela Cacciamani, CEO of Rome’s Cinecittà Studios. 

The film “will be shot entirely in Cinecittà starting in August and requires many theaters and stage constructions,” she said in an interview with Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore.

Released in 2004, “The Passion of the Christ” vividly depicts the final hours of Jesus’ life, from his arrest in the Garden of Gethsemane to his crucifixion. 

The film has been the subject of debate since its release. The graphic scenes of Christ’s scourging and crucifixion sparked controversy; some critics considered it excessively violent, while others praised it for its historical authenticity and its ability to realistically convey Christ’s suffering.

In January 2004, Joaquín Navarro-Valls, then director of the Holy See Press Office, noted that Pope John Paul II had seen the film and gave it a positive review, describing it as “the cinematographic recounting of the historical fact of the passion of Jesus Christ according to the Gospel accounts.”

Despite controversies surrounding the film, it garnered a profit of $370 million domestically with many crediting it as having opened the door to faith-based media in Hollywood.

null / Credit: Thomas Andreas/Shutterstock

CNA Staff, May 16, 2025 / 14:09 pm (CNA).

Here is a roundup of recent pro-life and abortion-related news:

HHS investigates conscience rights case

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is reviewing a hospital for compliance with federal conscience protections following reports that the hospital had denied ultrasound technicians exemptions from participating in abortions.

The department’s Office for Civil Rights on May 12 announced it had opened a review to investigate violations of free exercise and conscience protections.

Though unnamed in the HHS announcement, the legal group involved in the case confirmed in a statement that it had contact with the HHS about a hospital in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

The legal group American Center for Law and Justice alleged that Presbyterian Hospital was requiring religious staff to assist in abortions. The hospital had changed its policy in late 2024, requiring participation in abortion procedures, “even for longtime employees with religious objections,” said the law firm’s executive director, Jordan Sekulow.

After the firm sent a demand letter highlighting federal religious freedom requirements, the hospital granted the religious accommodation for five ultrasound technicians in February.

A federal investigation of this nature “is both rare and significant,” Sekulow said.

“It sends a powerful message to health care institutions across the country: You cannot force medical professionals to choose between their careers and their faith,” Sekulow added.

South Carolina Supreme Court rules in favor of heartbeat law

The South Carolina Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of a law that protects unborn babies at around six weeks after conception through what is known as a heartbeat law.

The law prohibits abortions from being performed on unborn children with “cardiac activity, or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart, within the gestational sac.” An ultrasound can detect an unborn baby’s cardiac activity at about six weeks.

In the unanimous ruling, judges acknowledged that South Carolina’s law was medically imprecise but maintained that lawmakers on both sides saw it as a six-week ban on abortion. 

Planned Parenthood argued in the lawsuit that the “or” in the law meant doctors should be able to terminate unborn children until the major parts of the heart come together, around nine weeks. 

Missouri passes referendum seeking repeal of abortion rights amendment

A referendum seeking the repeal of Missouri’s abortion rights amendment moved forward in the state Senate on Wednesday.

Missouri lawmakers approved a referendum that would repeal Amendment 79, an abortion rights amendment that voters passed in November 2024.

The measure passed in the state Senate by a 21-11 vote and in the House last month.

The referendum would also replace the amendment with protections against abortion for unborn children in most cases, with some exceptions for medical emergencies or if the unborn child has a fetal anomaly as well as in cases of rape or incest.

The measure would also prohibit gender transition surgeries, hormone treatments, and puberty blockers for minors.

The constitutional amendment would be open to voters in November 2026. If Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe calls for a special election, it could be voted on sooner.

Executive Director of Coalition Life Brian Westbrook called the passage an “opportunity to correct course” for Missouri voters in a statement to CNA.

“Protecting the unborn, safeguarding parental rights, and preserving the integrity of our health care system are not partisan issues — they are moral imperatives that speak to the heart of who we are as Missourians,” Westbrook said.

null / Credit: Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 16, 2025 / 12:34 pm (CNA).

Budget initiatives backed by several Republican lawmakers to cut federal funding for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for the next fiscal year are facing opposition from prominent Catholic organizations.

For Medicaid, the proposal would add work requirements for able-bodied adults under the age of 65 if they do not have young children as dependents. It would also shift some Medicaid costs to states if they offer benefits to immigrants who are in the country illegally.

The proposed SNAP reforms would shift some costs to states and raise the work requirement age from 54 to 64. It would also implement stricter verifications to ensure money is not given to immigrants who are in the country illegally.

These initiatives could potentially save the federal government more than $100 billion annually but could also cause millions of people to lose SNAP and Medicaid benefits.

Although much of the Republican majority in the House of Representatives has voiced support for these changes, Democratic members of Congress have strongly opposed them.

Catholic groups opposing Medicaid changes

Opposition to the plans has also come from two major Catholic groups: Catholic Charities USA (CCUSA) and the Catholic Health Association (CHA).

CCUSA, along with many of its local affiliates, has urged Americans to reach out to members of Congress to oppose reforms that could reduce Medicaid coverage.

“Any changes to the current Medicaid program risk reducing access to essential health care and behavioral health services for individuals with nowhere else to turn,” reads a CCUSA advocacy page on its website.

“Medicaid cuts would disproportionately impact people living in rural communities and small towns, the very communities that already have lower incomes, fewer opportunities for employment, and less access to social services,” it adds.

Luz Tavarez, the vice president of government affairs for CCUSA, told CNA that the organization does not want people to be put in situations in which they have to choose between “health care and their rent” or “food and their rent,” adding: “We really have serious concerns about these potential cuts.”

“There are some concerns with some of the additional burdens with becoming eligible and remaining eligible,” she said, contending that keeping up with the paperwork to demonstrate eligibility could be difficult for people who are busy raising children or trying to juggle work and school.

Tavarez said CCUSA has met with both Republican and Democratic members of Congress to voice their concerns with potential cuts. She said they have mostly had positive feedback: “They too are concerned with these potential cuts.”

CHA President and CEO Sister Mary Haddad said in a statement that her organization is “deeply concerned” with the proposal, saying it is “threatening access to care for millions of Americans — particularly those in underserved areas where our member systems work every single day to provide quality, compassionate care.”

“Congress has a moral obligation to consider the harm that such disastrous cuts would have on America’s health safety net and the impacts this proposal would have for America’s most vulnerable communities,” Haddad said. 

“Moreover, the cascading effects of lost coverage, including higher costs and greater strain on the system, will impact nearly all Americans — not just those who rely on Medicaid.”

Catholic Charities’ concerns about SNAP

On its advocacy page, CCUSA warns that the changes to SNAP would remove money “from vital food programs.”

“The text expands SNAP paperwork requirements for workers between 54 and 64 forcing them to jump through more bureaucratic red tape to receive food supplements,” it adds. “The bill dramatically shifts costs to the states by requiring states to increase administrative costs from 50% to 75% along with a new requirement for states to cover 5%-25% of SNAP benefit costs.”

Tavarez told CNA that many people CCUSA serves are already “making tough choices” when it comes to food, sometimes not being able to afford the most nutritious food or splitting one meal between several family members.

“These are anti-poverty programs,” Tavarez added. ”It’s not about giving people handouts.”

“If we have people losing health coverage and losing the ability to buy food, we’re going to be in a very difficult [situation],” she said.

If fewer people have access to SNAP benefits, Tavarez cautioned, “then they’re going to rely on our food pantries more and our pantries are already at capacity.” In such a situation, she said CCUSA is still “going to continue to do whatever we can,” adding: “It’s a Gospel mandate for us.”

Republicans allege ‘fearmongering’

Some Republican lawmakers who support the changes have accused opponents, particularly Democrats, of “fearmongering” and misrepresenting the proposed reforms.

Rep. Brett Guthrie, the chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said in a statement that Democrats are operating a “campaign to scare Americans without any of the details” in reference to the Medicaid reforms.

“This bill refocuses Medicaid on mothers, children, people with disabilities, and the elderly — not illegal immigrants and capable adults who choose not to work,” he said. “It is reckless that my colleagues on the other side of the aisle claimed an artificially high number in alleged coverage loss just so they can fearmonger and score political points.”

Similarly, on the proposed SNAP reforms, House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson said in a statement that SNAP “has drifted from a bridge to support American households in need to a permanent destination riddled with bureaucratic inefficiencies, misplaced incentives, and limited accountability.”

“[The plan] restores the program’s original intent, offering a temporary helping hand while encouraging work, cracking down on loopholes exploited by states, and protecting taxpayer dollars,” he added.

In an interview with “EWTN News Nightly” earlier this week, Global Premier Benefits CEO Tony Holland said he believes “the whole goal is to make [programs] more efficient.”

“Those that are able-bodied [and not working] should not receive benefits,” he said. “Those benefits should go to those that need the benefits the most.”

St. Hedwig’s Cathedral in Berlin, Germany. / Credit: Cedric BLN via Wikimedia (public domain)

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 16, 2025 / 11:21 am (CNA).

Here is a roundup of Catholic world news that you might have missed this week:

Berlin pharmacist ordered to give up practice after refusing to sell ‘morning-after’ pill

Berlin pharmacist Andreas Kersten was forced to end his practice this month after he refused to sell the so-called “morning-after” pill for reasons of conscience, according to CNA Deutsch, CNA’s German-language news partner.

Kersten was forced to withdraw his license as a pharmacist after the higher administrative court of Berlin-Brandenburg acquitted him of misconduct in June 2024 but ruled that pharmacists who cannot reconcile the sale of the morning-after pill must give up their profession.

“It is regrettable that pharmacists are denied the right to freedom of conscience when they adopt a pro-life attitude,” Kersten said. “I cannot reconcile the so-called ‘morning after pill’ with my conscience, because it could possibly end a human life. Therefore, I feel forced to give up my license as a pharmacist.”

Two new Catholic churches open in China

Catholics in the People’s Republic of China celebrated the opening of two new Catholic churches this past week, according to Fides News Service.

Catholics in the city of Xiaogan in the Chinese province of Hubei celebrated the opening of the Church of Christ the King on May 10. The new church, which has a 108-foot-high bell tower, includes a rectory and parish center.

Also, in the Archdiocese of Taiyuan, Shanxi province, Catholics in the rural parish of Guzhai consecrated a new church dedicated to Our Lady of China. 

Catholic Church in Nigeria desecrated, bishop directs reparation

All priests across the Diocese of Kafanchan in Nigeria have been instructed to celebrate a Mass of reparation on Friday after a local parish was broken into and consecrated hosts in the tabernacle were stolen, according to a Tuesday report from ACI Africa, CNA’s news partner in Africa.

“Such a wound to the mystical body of Christ calls for a united response of reparation and fervent intercession,” said Father Jacob Shanet, the chancellor of the Kafanchan Diocese. “This should be offered with the intention of making amends for this sacrilege and imploring the mercy of God upon those responsible,” he added.

Abductors demand ransom for Catholic priest kidnapped in Cameroon

Abductors are demanding a ransom for the release of Father Valentin Mbaïbarem, who was kidnapped on May 7 from Cameroon’s Archdiocese of Garoua, the chancellor of the Cameroonian metropolitan see told ACI Africa.

Father Emmanuel Bonkou revealed that Mbaïbarem’s captors are demanding 25 million FCFA (about $42,700) for his release. “We call upon everyone to unite in prayer for his release as search efforts are ongoing,” he said. 

A total of six persons were kidnapped at the same time as Mbaïbarem. “Four of the six hostages regained their freedom some days later,” Bonkou said. “Unfortunately, one of the hostages, a teacher named Diguerse Mathias, was killed by abductors after being unable to continue the forced walk due to exhaustion.”

Rebuilding Mosul’s churches: A testament to Christian roots

In Iraq’s Nineveh Plain, the Christian community of Mosul continues its slow but determined comeback, reported ACI MENA, CNA’s Arabic-language news partner. Nearly a decade after ISIS’ destruction, the faithful celebrated the restoration of the altar of the historic Al-Tahira Cathedral — which was visited by Pope Francis in 2021. 

Chaldean Archbishop Mikha Pola Maqdassi and Syriac Catholic priest Father Emmanuel Kallo stressed that rebuilding churches is more than preserving stone, it is about rekindling Christian identity and hope. Despite the limited return of Christian families to Mosul, church leaders insist their mission is to keep the light of faith burning, inviting all displaced Christians to reconnect with their ancestral city and heritage.

Emory University Hospital in Atlanta. / Credit: Harrison Keely, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

CNA Staff, May 16, 2025 / 10:39 am (CNA).

A Georgia hospital is requiring that a pregnant woman who was declared brain dead more than 90 days ago remain on life support until the birth of her unborn child.

In February, doctors declared 30-year-old Adriana Smith, a nurse who was nine weeks pregnant, brain dead after discovering multiple blood clots in her brain.

According to Smith’s mother, April Newkirk, after visiting the hospital complaining of painful headaches, Smith was “given medication” and sent home. Smith’s boyfriend found her “gasping for air” the next morning and called 911. After a CT scan, doctors discovered the blood clots and eventually determined nothing could be done.

Emory University Hospital in Atlanta informed Newkirk that due to Georgia state law, because Smith is brain dead and no longer considered at risk, her medical team is legally required to keep her on life support until her unborn child can survive outside the womb.

Smith’s family, including her young son, visits her in the hospital regularly. Newkirk told 11Alive that seeing her daughter, who is now 21 weeks pregnant, “breathing through machines” the last three months has been “torture.”

Newkirk said not having any choice in the matter has been difficult. She also said she is concerned about raising both her grandsons and the mounting medical costs.

“They’re hoping to get the baby to at least 32 weeks,” Newkirk said of Smith’s doctors. “But every day that goes by, it’s more cost, more trauma, more questions.”

Georgia law prohibits abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected, usually around the sixth week of pregnancy. While removing life support from a pregnant woman is not a direct abortion, Smith’s situation is not clear from a legal perspective.

The law defines abortion as “the act of using, prescribing, or administering any instrument, substance, device, or other means with the purpose to terminate a pregnancy with knowledge that termination will, with reasonable likelihood, cause the death of an unborn child.”

State Sen. Ed Setzler, lead sponsor of the Georgia law while he served in the state House of Representatives in 2019, told CNA that he is glad “the hospital is seeking to stabilize the child.” 

In Setzler’s opinion, the hospital’s reading of the law “is not inconsistent with the way the statute is crafted because of the direct foreseeability that ending the mother’s life ends the life of the child,” though “you could argue that the removal of the life support of the mother is a separate act” from an abortion.

While the Catholic Church teaches that direct abortion is always wrong, in a case like Smith’s, it is “complicated,” Joseph Meaney, senior fellow at the National Catholic Bioethics Center (NCBC), told CNA.

Meaney said the Church recognizes that in cases like Smith’s, where there is no clear teaching, a “discernment of conscience” is required. He said these situations can “reach a threshold of disproportionate burdens,” which can include financial considerations. 

Another NCBC ethicist, Joe Zalot, told CNA that Smith’s case is a question of prudential judgment. Removing Smith from life support “without the direct intent to kill her unborn child” is not an abortion, he said.

However, Zalot continued, “when a woman is pregnant, doctors will say they are treating two patients. In this case, you have one patient, the mother, who is deceased, and another patient who is alive.”

“The question is, if it can be demonstrated that we are not harming the mother,” Zalot said, “can we give the unborn child an opportunity to live?”

In the end, Meaney said, “the state of Georgia says it has state interest in the life of the child, and they’re stepping in.”

Emory Healthcare did not respond to CNA’s request for comment.

null / Credit: Orhan Cam/Shutterstock

CNA Staff, May 16, 2025 / 07:00 am (CNA).

Earlier this week, the House Energy and Commerce Committee unveiled its portion of the reconciliation bill, which included language to defund Planned Parenthood and abortion vendors for the next 10 years in the base text of the House bill.

Leading pro-life voices say the proposed congressional reconciliation bill could be a “historic opportunity” to stop federal funding from going to the abortion giant.

“Through a process called budget reconciliation, a new budget is being crafted that will soon be voted on by both chambers of Congress and sent to the White House for approval,” Students for Life of America President Kristan Hawkins said this week in a livestream that gathered together leading pro-life advocates.

“Our goal is to see Planned Parenthood and big abortion defunded of our taxpayer dollars once and for all through this process,” Hawkins said.

What is budget reconciliation? 

Reconciliation is an expedited process for passing laws related to spending, budget, or taxes. 

What makes the reconciliation process unique is that for certain budget-related bills, it allows for a simple majority vote in the Senate as opposed to the usual supermajority requirement. Getting a supermajority of 60 votes in the Senate is a challenge, but in budget reconciliation, bills can pass with a simple majority of 51 votes.

Reconciliation enables Congress to efficiently make fiscal policy changes. The process begins with the House and Senate budget committees creating budget resolutions and working together to pass an identical budget resolution.

After negotiating and voting on the reconciliation bills, the finalized reconciliation bill is brought to the president for a signature.

Why pro-lifers have high hopes

David Bereit, founder of 40 Days for Life and head of the Life Leadership Conference, called this opportunity “the best shot we’ve ever had.”

“With a Republican trifecta in Washington, Congress can finally use the budget reconciliation process to stop the forced taxpayer funding of the Big Abortion industry,” read an SBA statement shared with CNA.

Kristi Hamrick, vice president at Students for Life Action, noted that the language of disqualifying abortion vendors is in the “base text” of the bill. “An amendment is easy to throw away,” Hamrick told CNA. “But we’re written into the bill itself, and we’re written in for 10 years.”  

“A major hurdle was just passed,” Hamrick said. 

But the Republican majority in the House and Senate is slim — and not all right-leaning legislators consistently vote pro-life. 

According to Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser, moderate Republicans could be key to passing the bill. 

Without enough votes, legislators may have to comprise on the proposed 10-year pause on Planned Parenthood funding.

Hawkins and other pro-life voices are encouraging citizens to reach out to their members of Congress to encourage them to vote pro-life. 

Hawkins has high hopes for the reconciliation bill. “We know we can get out there and get this job done,” she said.

Why defund Planned Parenthood?   

While the Hyde Amendment blocks federal funding of abortion in programs like Medicaid, the abortion industry is still funded by the federal government via subsidies.

According to its most recent annual report, Planned Parenthood received $800 million in U.S. taxpayer funding, with taxpayer dollars making up nearly 40% of their funding. 

“Imagine if you or I had someone covering 40% of our bills,” Hamrick said. “That’s a lot of money, and that gives you a lot of freedom and flexibility.”

The same annual report revealed Planned Parenthood caused over 400,000 abortions. 

“Forcing Americans to fund the abortion industry is a gross abuse of our hard-earned tax dollars and it’s unconscionable how long it has gone on,” Dannenfelser said.

“Health care should promote health,” Hamrick added. “If your health care kills people on purpose, you’re doing it wrong.” 

More and better alternatives 

Hamrick noted that defunding Planned Parenthood “doesn’t cut health care dollars away from poor women.” 

Pro-life advocates like Dannenfelser also maintain that “better alternatives to businesses like Planned Parenthood exist for women.” 

A recent report from the Charlotte Lozier Institute — the research and policy arm of SBA — found that in the U.S., community health centers for women outnumber Planned Parenthood locations 15 to 1. 

Dannenfelser noted that the community health centers give “high quality care.” 

“These centers are accessible and provide much more comprehensive care without performing abortions,” Dannenfelser said. “And because Medicaid dollars follow patients, they can continue to use Medicaid.” 

“We want them to go to health care providers that care for them as a full person,” Hamrick added.  

Brian Burch’s nomination as U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See was blocked by Senate Democrats on May 13, 2025. / Credit: Photo courtesy of CRC Advisors

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 15, 2025 / 18:43 pm (CNA).

Senate Democrats this week blocked the confirmation of Brian Burch, President Donald Trump’s nominee for U.S. ambassador to the Holy See, stalling the nomination process ahead of Pope Leo XIV’s installation Mass this Sunday.

Burch, co-founder of the political advocacy group CatholicVote, must now garner 60 votes in the Senate, a three-fifths majority, after Democratic senators invoked the filibuster on more than 50 low-level nominations. A filibuster is a Senate tactic allowing senators to delay or block votes by extending debate, requiring 60 votes to invoke cloture and proceed to a final vote.

“I never thought I’d see the day when Democrats would be willing to block the nominee for ambassador to the Holy See simply to score political points with their far-left radicals, but it seems they’re still searching for rock bottom,” Missouri Republican Sen. Eric Schmitt, a Catholic, said in a statement to CNA.

“Now, with only two days until Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration, the United States will not have a diplomatic presence in the Vatican to the detriment of Catholic Americans across the nation,” he continued. “The Democrats’ political games are shameful, and the Senate should immediately vote on Brian Burch’s nomination to ensure the U.S. has a diplomatic presence at the Vatican as the new Roman Curia is installed.”

Schmitt slammed his Democrat colleagues on the Senate floor for blocking the nomination that had previously advanced along bipartisan lines by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, describing the Democrats’ blocking of Burch’s confirmation as “obstructionist.”

Later, in a livestream on social media platform X on Tuesday evening, Schmitt noted the Senate is currently working to confirm Trump’s lower-profile nominees while it awaits the passage of its reconciliation bill. However, in an unprecedented turn of events, Democratic senators placed “blanket holds” on a swath of nominations, invoking the filibuster to require 60 votes to confirm them.

The move will force the Senate to vote on and approve each nomination individually. It is unclear whether Burch’s nomination will happen before Sunday.

“Typically speaking, the idea that you would need to file cloture, meaning 60 votes for everything you do, is very unusual,” Schmitt said during the livestream, adding: “In fact, this obstructionism we’ve not seen since the Ford administration.”

Illustrating the unprecedented nature of invoking the filibuster for nominations, Schmitt pointed out that the Senate confirmed Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas with a simple majority of 52 votes. “Filibuster wasn’t used for everything,” he said, and “certainly not for ambassador positions that are not controversial, that are favorably voted out of the Foreign Relations Committee.” 

Schmitt reflected that the obstruction of Burch’s nomination “speaks to how broken the Democrats are,” adding: ”I just didn’t think it would play out in the way it did on the Senate floor today, that that would take them to the point of saying, ‘We’re not going to let the ambassador to the Vatican be at the installation of the pope,’ but that’s where we’re at.” 

CNA reached out to the office of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, for comment but did not hear back by time of publication.

Vice President JD Vance speaks at a film-screening event April 1, 2025, at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. / Credit: Erin Granzow/Courtesy of the Heritage Foundation

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 15, 2025 / 18:23 pm (CNA).

U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, both of whom are Catholic, will attend the inaugural Mass for Pope Leo XIV, the first U.S.-born pope, on Saturday, May 18.

The Mass is scheduled for 10 a.m. Rome time and will be celebrated in St. Peter’s Square to mark the beginning of Leo’s pontificate.

Vance, a convert to the faith, congratulated the Holy Father on his elevation to the papacy in a post on X following the new pope’s election, saying “millions of American Catholics and other Christians will pray for his successful work leading the Church.”

Shortly after his papacy was announced, prior posts on X from Leo that criticized Trump and Vance over the administration’s deportation and migration policies resurfaced on an account that has since been deleted.

In a May 9 interview with Hugh Hewitt, Vance addressed that issue, saying he tries not to “play the politicization of the pope game,” adding: “I’m sure he’s going to say a lot of things that I love [and] I’m sure he’ll say some things that I disagree with, but I’ll continue to pray for him and the Church despite it all and through it all, and that’ll be the way that I handle it.”

“The Church is about saving souls and about spreading the Gospel,” he added. “And yeah, it’s going to touch public policy from time to time as all human institutions do, but that’s not really what it’s about. And I think it’s much healthier for the American media, and certainly for Catholics, to not take such a, you know, politics in the age of social media attitude towards the papacy.”

Rubio also addressed the subject during a news conference on Thursday, making similar comments, saying: “I don’t view the papacy as a political office” and “I view it as a spiritual one.”

“The Church has strong social doctrine teachings, and I think there is not incompatibility,” Rubio said.

“We, too, are compassionate towards migrants,” he continued. “I would argue there’s nothing compassionate about mass migration. There’s nothing compassionate about open borders that allows people to be trafficked here. [It’s not compassionate] to the American people [either], … flooding our country with individuals that are criminals and prey on our communities.” 

Vance was last at the Vatican on April 20 and met Pope Francis the day prior to the pontiff’s death. During the meeting, the two exchanged Easter greetings and the pope gave Vance gifts for himself, his children, and his wife.

President Donald Trump was last at the Vatican for Francis’ April 26 funeral. In 2013, when Pope Francis was elevated to the papacy, the United States delegation to his inaugural Mass was also led by the vice president at the time, former president Joe Biden, who is also Catholic.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York, with Sister Mary Bosco of the Sisters of Mercy, a 100-year-old Irish nun who taught him to “love and serve the Lord.” / Credit: Photo courtesy of Cardinal Dolan

ACI Prensa Staff, May 15, 2025 / 17:03 pm (CNA).

Cardinal Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York, shared a video on May 14 in which he appears with Sister Mary Bosco of the Sisters of Mercy, a 100-year-old Irish nun who taught him to “love and serve the Lord.”

“I’m in Tullamore, Ireland, with my beloved Sister Mary Bosco! She’s 100 years old and she taught me when I was just a little boy,” the cardinal explained in a video posted on X after being in Rome participating in the conclave in which Pope Leo XIV was elected.

“Choosing is always important for God — he chooses us! I thank God for Sister Bosco’s vocation, the call of Pope Leo, for St. Matthias [whose feast day is May 14], and for my parents, who chose to get married today in 1949,” he added.

“That’s choice in action! Thank God for calling us,” he concluded. 

On Jan. 4, Dolan congratulated Sister Mary Bosco in a video message on her 100th birthday, noting that she “played a crucial role in my life,” as she was his teacher in second, fourth, and fifth grade.

“She taught me wisdom, she taught me knowledge, she taught me to put Jesus first. She taught me to know, love, and serve the Lord, she taught me to love the Church, to desire to receive the Lord in holy Communion and to strive to do my best to live the commandments and the beatitudes,” he recounted in January.

“I don’t know where I would be without her,” he shared at the time.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on Capitol Hill on May 14, 2025, in Washington, D.C. / Credit: Samuel Corum/Getty Images

CNA Staff, May 15, 2025 / 16:33 pm (CNA).

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reviewing the regulation and labeling of the abortion pill mifepristone following new evidence of safety concerns regarding its current use, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said on Wednesday.

More than 1 in 10 women who take the abortion pill mifepristone to complete a chemical abortion will suffer a serious health complication within 45 days of taking the drug, a recent study by the Ethics and Public Policy Center found.

The study also found that the rate of serious adverse side effects occurs at 22 times the rate that the FDA-approved drug label currently indicates.

“It’s alarming, and clearly it indicates that, at very least, the label should be changed,” Kennedy said when asked about the study by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, during a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing. 

During the hearing, Kennedy said that he has asked FDA director Marty Makary to “do a complete review and report back.” The FDA is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services.

On Wednesday, a coalition of more than 100 organizations called for a review and restoration of previous federal safety regulations for the abortion drug in light of the study.

The open letter noted that under the Obama and Biden administrations, the FDA had removed various safety requirements including requirements for in-person prescriptions, provider follow-ups, and a doctor to be involved at any stage of the chemical abortion process.

“The evidence strongly suggests that mifepristone is unacceptably dangerous, and those who removed such protections put American women directly in harm’s way,” read the letter, which was signed by groups such as Americans United for Life, the Ethics and Public Policy Center, the American Association of Pro-Life OBGYNs, and dozens of other groups.

Various Catholic organizations are among the letter’s signatories, including the Catholic conferences of Colorado and Oklahoma.

“We encourage the administration and FDA to put the safety of women first and take a serious look at the data showing chemical abortion is neither safe nor effective,” the letter stated.

American Civil Liberties Union’s Julia Kaye, senior staff attorney for the Reproductive Freedom Project, criticized Kennedy’s decision to review the pill.

“If the FDA moves forward with this politically motivated review, that is a dangerous sign that the president is going back on his promises to voters not to restrict abortion access even further,” Kaye said in a statement.

In an interview last December, President Donald Trump promised that he would not ban the abortion pill but did not rule out regulating the drugs. Earlier this year, Kennedy said he planned to investigate safety concerns related to mifepristone.

Last week, Trump’s nominee for deputy secretary of the HHS, Jim O’Neill, also pledged to conduct a review of the safety of mifepristone in light of the EPPC’s study.

Chemical abortions make up 63% of abortions in the U.S., according to data from the Guttmacher Institute.

According to the EPPC, its study is the most comprehensive research on the abortion pill to date and is based on an insurance claims dataset that is 28 times larger than all the FDA-cited clinical trials.